Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation on construct in" » "pose computation on construct in" (Expand search), "these computations on construct in" (Expand search), "the computation on construct in" (Expand search), "whose computation of construct in" (Expand search), "whose computation in construct in" (Expand search), "whose computation and construct in" (Expand search), "whose computation on construction in" (Expand search), "whose computation non constructive in" (Expand search), "whose computation on constructs in" (Expand search), "whose computation on constructed in" (Expand search), "whose computation on construct and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation on construct in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation on construct in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation on construct in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.