Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation nets objective programming" » "pose computation nets objective programming" (Expand search), "these computations nets objective programming" (Expand search), "the computation nets objective programming" (Expand search), "whose computation with objective programming" (Expand search), "whose computation to objective programming" (Expand search), "whose computation networks objective programming" (Expand search), "whose computation new objective programming" (Expand search), "whose computation needs objectives programming" (Expand search), "whose computation suits objective programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computation nets objective programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation nets objective programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation nets objective programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.