Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation models coverage on" » "whose computation model coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational models coverage on" (Expand search), "whose competition models coverage on" (Expand search), "pose computation models coverage on" (Expand search), "these computations models coverage on" (Expand search), "the computation models coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation code coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation model average on" (Expand search), "whose computation models covariance on" (Expand search), "whose computation models coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computation models coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation models coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation models coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation models coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation models coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.