Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation maximal coverage in" » "whose computation media coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation mental coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation binomial coverage in" (Expand search), "pose computation maximal coverage in" (Expand search), "these computations maximal coverage in" (Expand search), "the computation maximal coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation maximum coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation maximal covering in" (Expand search), "whose computation vacinal coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation maximal coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation maximal coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation maximal coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation maximal coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.