Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation lexical coverage in" » "whose computational lexical coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computational logical coverage in" (Expand search), "whose comparative lexical coverage in" (Expand search), "pose computation lexical coverage in" (Expand search), "these computations lexical coverage in" (Expand search), "the computation lexical coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation maximal coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation local coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation political coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation lexical coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computation lexical coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation lexical coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation lexical coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.