Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation in static processing" » "pose computation in static processing" (Expand search), "these computations in static processing" (Expand search), "the computation in static processing" (Expand search), "whose computation in state processing" (Expand search), "whose computation in syntactic processing" (Expand search), "whose computation in semantic processing" (Expand search), "whose computation and static processing" (Expand search), "whose computation of static processing" (Expand search), "whose imputation in static processing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation in static processing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation in static processing ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation in static processing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.