Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation in routine programming" » "whose computation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "whose computation in cone programming" (Expand search), "whose computation in line programming" (Expand search), "pose computation in routine programming" (Expand search), "these computations in routine programming" (Expand search), "the computation in routine programming" (Expand search), "whose computation and routine programming" (Expand search), "whose computation of routine programming" (Expand search), "whose imputation in routine programming" (Expand search), "whose computation _ routine programming" (Expand search)
"using in python python programming" » "using in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using in piton python programming" (Expand search), "using in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using _ python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation in routine programming\") OR (\"using in python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation in routine programming ) OR ( using in python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation in routine programming") OR ("using in python python programming"))*.