Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation in graphic programming" » "whose computation in graphical programming" (Expand search), "whose computation in genetic programming" (Expand search), "whose computation in generic programming" (Expand search), "pose computation in graphic programming" (Expand search), "these computations in graphic programming" (Expand search), "the computation in graphic programming" (Expand search), "whose computation and graphic programming" (Expand search), "whose computation of graphic programming" (Expand search), "whose imputation in graphic programming" (Expand search), "whose computation en graphic programming" (Expand search), "whose computation _ graphic programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computation in graphic programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation in graphic programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation in graphic programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.