Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation in generative and" » "pose computation in generative and" (Expand search), "these computations in generative and" (Expand search), "the computation in generative and" (Expand search), "whose computation and generative and" (Expand search), "whose computation of generative and" (Expand search), "whose imputation in generative and" (Expand search), "whose computation in regenerative and" (Expand search), "whose computation in generation and" (Expand search), "whose computation in generative ai" (Expand search), "whose computation on generative and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation in generative and\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation in generative and ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation in generative and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.