Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation in fat programming" » "pose computation in fat programming" (Expand search), "these computations in fat programming" (Expand search), "the computation in fat programming" (Expand search), "whose computation in data programming" (Expand search), "whose computation in set programming" (Expand search), "whose computation in fate reprogramming" (Expand search), "whose computation and fat programming" (Expand search), "whose computation of fat programming" (Expand search), "whose imputation in fat programming" (Expand search), "whose computation in fast programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation in fat programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation in fat programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation in fat programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.