Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation in effective processing" » "whose computation in affective processing" (Expand search), "whose computation in defective processing" (Expand search), "whose computation in effective process" (Expand search), "pose computation in effective processing" (Expand search), "these computations in effective processing" (Expand search), "the computation in effective processing" (Expand search), "whose computation and effective processing" (Expand search), "whose computation of effective processing" (Expand search), "whose imputation in effective processing" (Expand search), "whose computation an effective processing" (Expand search), "whose computation _ effective processing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computation in effective processing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation in effective processing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation in effective processing ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.