Talvez deva tentar algumas variações de ortografia:
"whose computation gnu octave programming" » "whose computation gnu stage programming" (Expandir a busca), "whose computation gnu objective programming" (Expandir a busca), "whose computation gnu reactive programming" (Expandir a busca), "pose computation gnu octave programming" (Expandir a busca), "these computations gnu octave programming" (Expandir a busca), "the computation gnu octave programming" (Expandir a busca), "whose computation and octave programming" (Expandir a busca), "whose computation in octave programming" (Expandir a busca), "whose computation on octave programming" (Expandir a busca)
"using codigo python python programming" » "using codigo pythons python programming" (Expandir a busca), "using codigo piton python programming" (Expandir a busca), "using codigo pitons python programming" (Expandir a busca), "using indigo python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "using coding python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "using codium python python programming" (Expandir a busca)

Você pode obter mais resultados ajustando o argumento de busca.

• Fazer uma busca fuzzy pode resultar em termos de grafias semelhantes: (("whose computation gnu octave programming") OR ("using codigo python python programming"))~.
• As palavras AND, OR e NOT pode ocasionar problemas na busca; tente utilizar as aspas: "((\"whose computation gnu octave programming\") OR (\"using codigo python python programming\"))*".
• Remover as aspas pode possibilitar buscas mais amplas: (( whose computation gnu octave programming ) OR ( using codigo python python programming ))*.