Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation design coverage on" » "whose computational design coverage on" (Expand search), "whose competition design coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computacional design coverage on" (Expand search), "pose computation design coverage on" (Expand search), "these computations design coverage on" (Expand search), "the computation design coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation pension coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation design cover on" (Expand search), "whose computation design coletanea on" (Expand search), "whose computation design coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computation design coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation design coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation design coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation design coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation design coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.