Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation changes coverage in" » "whose composition changes coverage in" (Expand search), "whose population changes coverage in" (Expand search), "whose compaction changes coverage in" (Expand search), "pose computation changes coverage in" (Expand search), "these computations changes coverage in" (Expand search), "the computation changes coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation cancer coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation enhanced coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation changes correlate in" (Expand search), "whose computation changes coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose computation changes coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation changes coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation changes coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation changes coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.