Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation bone coverage in" » "pose computation bone coverage in" (Expand search), "these computations bone coverage in" (Expand search), "the computation bone coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation on coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation non coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation model coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation code coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation and coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation the coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation bone coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation bone coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation bone coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation bone coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.