Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose computation block coverage on" » "pose computation block coverage on" (Expand search), "these computations block coverage on" (Expand search), "the computation block coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational block coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computational blood coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation of coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation stock coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation bone coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation broad coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation block coverage of" (Expand search), "whose computation block coverage in" (Expand search), "whose computation block coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose computation block coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose computation block coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose computation block coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.