Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose complexation with concurrent programming" » "whose complexation with constraint programming" (Expand search), "the complexation with concurrent programming" (Expand search), "post complexation with concurrent programming" (Expand search), "whose computation with concurrent programming" (Expand search), "whose competition with concurrent programming" (Expand search), "whose combination with concurrent programming" (Expand search), "whose composition with concurrent programming" (Expand search), "whose complexation with recurrent programming" (Expand search), "whose complexation with current programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("whose complexation with concurrent programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose complexation with concurrent programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose complexation with concurrent programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose complexation with concurrent programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.