Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"whose complexation driven sampling code" » "whose complexation in sampling code" (Expand search), "whose complexation sites sampling code" (Expand search), "the complexation driven sampling code" (Expand search), "post complexation driven sampling code" (Expand search), "whose computation driven sampling code" (Expand search), "whose complexation driven sampling model" (Expand search), "whose complexation driven sampling cost" (Expand search), "whose complexation driven sampling models" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"whose complexation driven sampling code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( whose complexation driven sampling code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("whose complexation driven sampling code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.