Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"valued optimization using routine programming" » "value optimization using routine programming" (Expand search), "based optimization using routine programming" (Expand search), "fluid optimization using routine programming" (Expand search), "valued optimization using reactive programming" (Expand search), "valued optimization using cone programming" (Expand search), "valued optimization using line programming" (Expand search), "valued optimization and routine programming" (Expand search), "valued optimization during routine programming" (Expand search), "valued optimization using rotating programming" (Expand search), "valued optimization in routine programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("valued optimization using routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"valued optimization using routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( valued optimization using routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.