Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using separation in computational code" » "using separation in computational model" (Expand search), "using separation in computational cost" (Expand search), "using separation in computational models" (Expand search), "using penetration in computational code" (Expand search), "and separation in computational code" (Expand search), "using simulation in computational code" (Expand search), "using separation and computational code" (Expand search), "using separation _ computational code" (Expand search), "using separation of computational code" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using separation in computational code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using separation in computational code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using separation in computational code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.