Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using scripting in conductive programming" » "using scripting in inductive programming" (Expand search), "using scripting in collective programming" (Expand search), "using scripting in objective programming" (Expand search), "site scripting in conductive programming" (Expand search), "using scripts in conductive programming" (Expand search), "using description in conductive programming" (Expand search), "using scripting and conductive programming" (Expand search), "using scripting of conductive programming" (Expand search), "using scripting in conducting programming" (Expand search), "using scripting _ conductive programming" (Expand search), "using script in conductive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using scripting in conductive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using scripting in conductive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using scripting in conductive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.