Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using routine in inductive programming" » "using routine in disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "using routine in objective programming" (Expand search), "using routine in reactive programming" (Expand search), "during routine in inductive programming" (Expand search), "using rotating in inductive programming" (Expand search), "in routine in inductive programming" (Expand search), "using routine an inductive programming" (Expand search), "using routine in inductively programming" (Expand search), "using routine and inductive programming" (Expand search), "using routine of inductive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using routine in inductive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using routine in inductive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using routine in inductive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.