Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using routine and generalized programming" » "using routine and generative programming" (Expand search), "using routine and general programming" (Expand search), "using routine and generalized hamming" (Expand search), "using routine in generalized programming" (Expand search), "using routine _ generalized programming" (Expand search), "during routine and generalized programming" (Expand search), "using rotating and generalized programming" (Expand search), "in routine and generalized programming" (Expand search), "using routing and generalized programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using routine and generalized programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using routine and generalized programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using routine and generalized programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.