Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using perturbation and objective programming" » "in perturbation and objective programming" (Expand search), "packing perturbation and objective programming" (Expand search), "and perturbation and objective programming" (Expand search), "using perturbation in objective programming" (Expand search), "using perturbations in objective programming" (Expand search), "using perturbation of objective programming" (Expand search), "using perturbation and subjective programming" (Expand search), "using perturbation and object programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using perturbation and objective programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using perturbation and objective programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using perturbation and objective programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.