Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using log discourse complexity from" » "using log discursive complexity from" (Expand search), "using log disclosure complexity from" (Expand search), "using log discourse community from" (Expand search), "using blog discourse complexity from" (Expand search), "using vlog discourse complexity from" (Expand search), "using blogs discourse complexity from" (Expand search), "using long discourse complexity from" (Expand search), "using low discourse complexity from" (Expand search), "using lhc discourse complexity from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using log discourse complexity from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using log discourse complexity from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using log discourse complexity from ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using log discourse complexity from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.