Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using insertion with computational code" » "using insertion _ computational code" (Expand search), "using insertion and computational code" (Expand search), "using insertion by computational code" (Expand search), "using insertion with computational model" (Expand search), "using insertion with computational cost" (Expand search), "using insertion with computational models" (Expand search), "during insertion with computational code" (Expand search), "using interaction with computational code" (Expand search), "using inertial with computational code" (Expand search), "using reinsertion with computational code" (Expand search), "using inspection with computational code" (Expand search), "using insertion site computational code" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using insertion with computational code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using insertion with computational code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using insertion with computational code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.