Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using insertion and computational code" » "using insertion and computational model" (Expand search), "using insertion and computational cost" (Expand search), "using insertion and computational models" (Expand search), "using insertion _ computational code" (Expand search), "during insertion and computational code" (Expand search), "using interaction and computational code" (Expand search), "using inertial and computational code" (Expand search), "using insertion in computational code" (Expand search), "using insertion of computational code" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using insertion and computational code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using insertion and computational code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using insertion and computational code ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using insertion and computational code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.