Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using implications on java programming" » "nursing implications on java programming" (Expand search), "aging implications on java programming" (Expand search), "running implications on java programming" (Expand search), "using implications on and programming" (Expand search), "using implications on based programming" (Expand search), "using implications on goal programming" (Expand search), "using implications of java programming" (Expand search), "using implications in java programming" (Expand search), "using implications _ java programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using implications on java programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using implications on java programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using implications on java programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.