Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using implications on computational code" » "nursing implications on computational code" (Expand search), "aging implications on computational code" (Expand search), "running implications on computational code" (Expand search), "using implications on computational model" (Expand search), "using implications on computational cost" (Expand search), "using implications on computational models" (Expand search), "using implications in computational code" (Expand search), "using implications and computational code" (Expand search), "using implications _ computational code" (Expand search), "using implications of computational code" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using implications on computational code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using implications on computational code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using implications on computational code ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using implications on computational code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.