Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using function prerogative computation code" » "using function pervasive computation code" (Expand search), "using function creative computation code" (Expand search), "using function speculative computation code" (Expand search), "using function prerogative computational code" (Expand search), "using function prerogative computation model" (Expand search), "using function prerogative computation co" (Expand search), "using functional prerogative computation code" (Expand search), "using friction prerogative computation code" (Expand search), "guiding function prerogative computation code" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using function prerogative computation code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using function prerogative computation code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using function prerogative computation code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.