Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using conversation discourse complexity code" » "using conversational discourse complexity code" (Expand search), "using conversation discursive complexity code" (Expand search), "using corruption discourse complexity code" (Expand search), "using conversation disclosure complexity code" (Expand search), "using conversation discourse community code" (Expand search), "using condensation discourse complexity code" (Expand search), "in conversation discourse complexity code" (Expand search), "using conformation discourse complexity code" (Expand search), "using conversation discourse complexity model" (Expand search), "using conversation discourse complexity care" (Expand search), "using conversation discourse complexity costs" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using conversation discourse complexity code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using conversation discourse complexity code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using conversation discourse complexity code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.