Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computing time coverage in" » "using competing time coverage in" (Expand search), "mining computing time coverage in" (Expand search), "using conducting time coverage in" (Expand search), "using commuting time coverage in" (Expand search), "using composting time coverage in" (Expand search), "using computing aimed coverage in" (Expand search), "using computing the coverage in" (Expand search), "using computing live coverage in" (Expand search), "using computing time average in" (Expand search), "using computing time coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computing time coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computing time coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using computing time coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.