Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computationally driven sampling code" » "using computationally guided sampling code" (Expand search), "using rotationally driven sampling code" (Expand search), "using computationally designed sampling code" (Expand search), "using computational driven sampling code" (Expand search), "making computationally driven sampling code" (Expand search), "using computacional driven sampling code" (Expand search), "using computationally driven sampling model" (Expand search), "using computationally driven sampling cost" (Expand search), "using computationally driven sampling models" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computationally driven sampling code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computationally driven sampling code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using computationally driven sampling code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.