Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computationally driven coverage in" » "using computationally guided coverage in" (Expand search), "using rotationally driven coverage in" (Expand search), "using computationally designed coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational driven coverage in" (Expand search), "making computationally driven coverage in" (Expand search), "using computacional driven coverage in" (Expand search), "using computationally green coverage in" (Expand search), "using computationally live coverage in" (Expand search), "using computationally driven coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using computationally driven coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computationally driven coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computationally driven coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.