Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computational vision functions data" » "using computational design functions data" (Expand search), "using computational biology functions data" (Expand search), "using computational simulation functions data" (Expand search), "and computational vision functions data" (Expand search), "using computational fusion functions data" (Expand search), "using computational revisions functions data" (Expand search), "using computational vision dysfunctions data" (Expand search), "using computational vision functional data" (Expand search), "using computational vision functions at" (Expand search), "using computational vision functions and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using computational vision functions data") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computational vision functions data\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computational vision functions data ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.