Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computational shelf adaptive programming" » "using computational shelf reactive programming" (Expand search), "using computational shelf adaptive programs" (Expand search), "using computational shelf objective programming" (Expand search), "and computational shelf adaptive programming" (Expand search), "using computational self adaptive programming" (Expand search), "using computational scheme adaptive programming" (Expand search), "using computational speed adaptive programming" (Expand search), "using computational self adapive programming" (Expand search), "using computational self adaptative programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using computational shelf adaptive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computational shelf adaptive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computational shelf adaptive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.