Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computational reuse coverage in" » "and computational reuse coverage in" (Expand search), "using computation reuse coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational resource coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational response coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational rule coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational cusp coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational tube coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational reuse coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using computational reuse coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computational reuse coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computational reuse coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using computational reuse coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.