Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computational in cognition object" » "and computational in cognition object" (Expand search), "using computational and cognition object" (Expand search), "using computational _ cognition object" (Expand search), "using computational 3d cognition object" (Expand search), "using computational in cognition aec" (Expand search), "using computational in cognition et" (Expand search), "using computational in communication object" (Expand search), "using computational on cognition object" (Expand search), "using computational in cognitive object" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using computational in cognition object") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computational in cognition object\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computational in cognition object ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.