Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computational gnu declarative programming" » "using computational gnu reactive programming" (Expand search), "and computational gnu declarative programming" (Expand search), "using computational and declarative programming" (Expand search), "using computational agent declarative programming" (Expand search), "using computational group declarative programming" (Expand search), "using computational in declarative programming" (Expand search), "using computational on declarative programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using computational gnu declarative programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computational gnu declarative programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computational gnu declarative programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using computational gnu declarative programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.