Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computational gauss coverage in" » "and computational gauss coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational games coverage in" (Expand search), "using computation gauss coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational grids coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational grass coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational grosso coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational values coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational gauss coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computational gauss coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computational gauss coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using computational gauss coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.