Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computational effect octave programming" » "using computational effort octave programming" (Expand search), "using computational expert octave programming" (Expand search), "using computational aspects octave programming" (Expand search), "and computational effect octave programming" (Expand search), "using computational effect stage programming" (Expand search), "using computational effect objective programming" (Expand search), "using computational effect reactive programming" (Expand search), "using computational effect case programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using computational effect octave programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computational effect octave programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computational effect octave programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.