Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computational designed coverage problem" » "using computationally designed coverage problem" (Expand search), "using computational design coverage problem" (Expand search), "using computacional design coverage problem" (Expand search), "and computational designed coverage problem" (Expand search), "using computational signal coverage problem" (Expand search), "using computational device coverage problem" (Expand search), "using computational designed covering problem" (Expand search), "using computational designed covering problems" (Expand search), "using computational designed coverage from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using computational designed coverage problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computational designed coverage problem\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computational designed coverage problem ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.