Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computational code feeding program" » "and computational code feeding program" (Expand search), "using computational model feeding program" (Expand search), "using computational cost feeding program" (Expand search), "using computational models feeding program" (Expand search), "using imputational code feeding program" (Expand search), "using compilational code feeding program" (Expand search), "using coaptational code feeding program" (Expand search), "using computational chose feeding program" (Expand search), "using computational care feeding program" (Expand search), "using computational choice feeding program" (Expand search)
"using computation in examples of" » "using imputation in examples of" (Expand search), "using compilation in examples of" (Expand search), "using coaptation in examples of" (Expand search), "using computation and examples of" (Expand search), "using computation of examples of" (Expand search), "using computation on examples of" (Expand search), "using computation main examples of" (Expand search), "using computation in example of" (Expand search), "using computation in samples of" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using computational code feeding program") OR ("using computation in examples of"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computational code feeding program\") OR (\"using computation in examples of\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computational code feeding program ) OR ( using computation in examples of )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using computational code feeding program") OR ("using computation in examples of"))*.