Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computational based octave programming" » "and computational based octave programming" (Expand search), "using computational bases octave programming" (Expand search), "using computacional bases octave programming" (Expand search), "using computational basis octave programming" (Expand search), "using computational based stage programming" (Expand search), "using computational based objective programming" (Expand search), "using computational based reactive programming" (Expand search), "using computational based case programming" (Expand search), "using computational based wave programming" (Expand search), "using computational based ota programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using computational based octave programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computational based octave programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computational based octave programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.