Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computational arithmetic coverage in" » "using computational aesthetics coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational mathematics coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational geometric coverage in" (Expand search), "and computational arithmetic coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational arithmetic average in" (Expand search), "using computational automatic coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational altmetric coverage in" (Expand search), "using computational arithmetic coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computational arithmetic coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computational arithmetic coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using computational arithmetic coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.