Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computation in computational cost" » "using computation in computational and" (Expand search), "using computation in computational design" (Expand search), "using computation in computational vision" (Expand search), "using computational in computational cost" (Expand search), "using imputation in computational cost" (Expand search), "using compilation in computational cost" (Expand search), "using computation and computational cost" (Expand search), "using computation _ computational cost" (Expand search), "using computation of computational cost" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using computation in computational cost") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computation in computational cost\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computation in computational cost ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.