Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computation with recurrent programming" » "using computation with concurrent programming" (Expand search), "using computation with concorrent programming" (Expand search), "using computation with secure programming" (Expand search), "using computational with recurrent programming" (Expand search), "using imputation with recurrent programming" (Expand search), "using compilation with recurrent programming" (Expand search), "using competition with recurrent programming" (Expand search), "using complexation with recurrent programming" (Expand search), "using composition with recurrent programming" (Expand search)
"using computation in coding program" » "using computational in coding program" (Expand search), "using imputation in coding program" (Expand search), "using compilation in coding program" (Expand search), "using computation and coding program" (Expand search), "using computation of coding program" (Expand search), "using computation in cloning program" (Expand search), "using computation in loading program" (Expand search), "using computation in cooling programs" (Expand search), "using computation on coding program" (Expand search), "using computation in decoding program" (Expand search), "using computation non coding program" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using computation in coding program") OR ("using computation with recurrent programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using computation in coding program\") OR (\"using computation with recurrent programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using computation in coding program ) OR ( using computation with recurrent programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using computation in coding program") OR ("using computation with recurrent programming"))*.