Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using complexity based coverage on" » "using complex based coverage on" (Expand search), "using complete based coverage on" (Expand search), "design complexity based coverage on" (Expand search), "using complexity and coverage on" (Expand search), "using complexity beyond coverage on" (Expand search), "using complexity index coverage on" (Expand search), "using complexity based beverage on" (Expand search), "using complexity based beverages on" (Expand search), "using complexity based coverage of" (Expand search), "using complexity based coverage in" (Expand search), "using complexity based coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using complexity based coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using complexity based coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using complexity based coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using complexity based coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.