Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using code in regenerative programming" » "using code in generative programming" (Expand search), "using code in declarative programming" (Expand search), "using code in imperative programming" (Expand search), "using code and regenerative programming" (Expand search), "using code skin regeneration programming" (Expand search), "using code in neurodegenerative programming" (Expand search), "using cone in regenerative programming" (Expand search), "using co in regenerative programming" (Expand search), "using co2 in regenerative programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using code in regenerative programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using code in regenerative programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using code in regenerative programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.