Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using code based coverage on" » "using code based beverage on" (Expand search), "using code based beverages on" (Expand search), "using code and coverage on" (Expand search), "using code based coverage of" (Expand search), "using code based coverage in" (Expand search), "using code based coverage and" (Expand search), "using cone based coverage on" (Expand search), "using co based coverage on" (Expand search), "using co2 based coverage on" (Expand search), "using case based coverage on" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using code based coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using code based coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using code based coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using code based coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.